C-285 · 45-1

Used Car Tax Cut Act

An Act to amend the Excise Tax Act (used motor vehicles)

Outside the Order of Precedence
Currently at: Proposal — introduced (House 1st reading)
Introduced
2026-06-12
Debated
1 mention in Parliament
Sponsor
Andrew Lawton · Conservative · Elgin—St. Thomas—London South (ON)
Summary

This bill, called the Used Car Tax Cut Act, would change how federal sales tax applies to used vehicles sold in Canada. It amends the Excise Tax Act so that sales of used motor vehicles designed for highway use, including motor homes, become "zero-rated" supplies, meaning no GST would be charged on their sale. To count, the vehicle must have already been registered to a previous owner under a province's laws.

The change would not apply to brand-new vehicles that are simply registered to a dealership before their first sale to a customer; those would still be taxed as new vehicles normally are. The reasoning given in the bill is that a used vehicle has already had sales tax paid on it once, when it was first purchased new, so taxing it again at resale is seen as an unnecessary double taxation.

In practical terms, if this bill becomes law, Canadians buying or selling used cars, trucks, or motor homes privately or through dealers would no longer have GST added to the sale price of the vehicle itself, potentially lowering the cost of purchasing a used vehicle.

Powers and oversight

This bill amends the Excise Tax Act to add used motor vehicles to the list of zero-rated supplies under the GST/HST system.

  • What changes — sales of used motor vehicles designed for highway use (including motor homes) that were previously registered to another owner under provincial law become zero-rated supplies, meaning no GST/HST is charged on them.
  • Exclusion defined in the bill — the zero-rating does not apply to a new vehicle registered to a dealer solely for the purpose of its first sale.
  • Who administers this — no new body or office is created; the change operates through the existing Excise Tax Act framework administered by the Canada Revenue Agency.
  • Discretion — none is granted to ministers or officials; the criteria for what qualifies (used, highway-designed, previously provincially registered) are set out directly in the bill's text.
  • Future regulation — the bill does not leave any details to be defined later by regulation; the change is complete as written.
  • Oversight — the bill contains no review clause, reporting requirement, or sunset provision.

Read from the bill's own text by AI. It describes what the bill allows, not whether that is justified.

Stage history

  1. Proposal — introduced (House 1st reading)Jun 12, 2026