S-6 · 45-1

Federal Law–Civil Law Harmonization Act, No. 4

A fourth Act to harmonize federal law with the civil law of Quebec and to amend certain Acts in order to ensure that each language version takes into account the common law and the civil law

Senate bill, now waiting to be considered in the House
Currently at: Senate — 3rd reading Introduced Feb 24. Reached Senate — 3rd reading on Jun 17.
Introduced
2026-02-24
Debated
2 mentions in Parliament
Sponsor
Pierre Moreau
Summary

Bill S-6, the Federal Law–Civil Law Harmonization Act, No. 4, is a technical bill that does not change what the law actually permits or prohibits for Canadians. Instead, it fine-tunes the wording of about 51 federal statutes so that the English and French versions of each law properly reflect both of Canada's two legal traditions: the common law used in most provinces and the civil law used in Quebec. This is the fourth bill in an ongoing Justice Department project that began after Quebec's Civil Code was substantially rewritten in 1994, changing many of the legal concepts and terms used there.

Much of the bill involves swapping in more precise or bijural terminology - for example, adding "or immovable" alongside "real property," referring to "hypothec" alongside "mortgage," or "liquidator of a succession" alongside "executor" - so that legal documents, contracts, and court proceedings work correctly regardless of which province's legal system applies. It also replaces terms like "agent" with "agent or mandatary" throughout many provisions, since "mandatary" is the civil law equivalent used in Quebec.

The bulk of the amendments affect laws governing banks and other financial institutions (the Bank Act, Insurance Companies Act, Trust and Loan Companies Act, and Cooperative Credit Associations Act), updating provisions on things like security interests, mortgages, estates, trusts, and corporate transactions. The remaining changes touch dozens of other federal statutes, ranging from the Access to Information Act and the Interpretation Act to the Museums Act and the Conflict of Interest Act, generally adjusting a few specific terms in each. The bill does not alter people's rights, obligations, or how any government program operates; its purpose is purely to ensure legal consistency and clarity between Canada's two legal systems and two official languages.

Powers and oversight

This bill amends 51 federal statutes to align their English and French legal terminology with both the common law and Quebec's civil law traditions, without changing the substance of any existing rule.

  • Nature of the changes — the bill replaces terms, definitions and phrasings (e.g., "personal representative," "agent or mandatary," "real property or immovable," "security interest") throughout financial-institution statutes and dozens of other Acts so that each language version properly reflects both legal traditions used in Canada.
  • Scope — covers the Bank Act, Insurance Companies Act, Trust and Loan Companies Act, Cooperative Credit Associations Act, and related corporate statutes, plus general statutes such as the Access to Information Act, Interpretation Act, Official Languages Act, Financial Administration Act, and Conflict of Interest Act.
  • No new powers or duties created — the amendments are technical harmonization of vocabulary and cross-references; they do not create new bodies, grant new discretionary powers to ministers or regulators, impose new obligations on individuals or companies, or change any penalty, threshold, or dollar figure beyond restating existing ones in harmonized language.
  • Oversight — none of the amendments introduce or remove reporting, review, or sunset mechanisms, since no new discretionary authority is being conferred.

In short, this is a legislative "clean-up" bill: it makes existing federal law read correctly in both legal traditions and both official languages, and it does not by itself make anything new possible that was not already possible under the prior wording of these statutes.

Read from the bill's own text by AI. It describes what the bill allows, not whether that is justified.

Stage history

  1. Proposal — introduced (Senate 1st reading)Feb 24, 2026
  2. Senate — 2nd readingApr 16, 2026 · 51 days later
  3. Senate — 3rd readingJun 17, 2026 · 62 days later